Mass urbanization post-World War II has left Helsinki with a legacy of ageing, energy-inefficient buildings. With these structures contributing significantly to carbon emissions, energy-efficiency renovations (EERs) are essential to achieving the city’s ambitious carbon neutrality goals by 2030. Addressing these emissions through EERs is crucial for climate change mitigation and strengthening the resilience of our urban infrastructure.
Properly managing EERs significantly improves their energy performance to meet modern sustainability standards, ensuring the longevity and sustainability of these buildings for future generations. However, reaching these goals is complex and hindered by financial, regulatory, and technical challenges. This blog post explores these key problems and the solutions proposed in my thesis, “Exploring the Barriers to Energy-Efficiency Renovations of Housing Associations in Helsinki, Finland”. This research draws on survey and interview data collected from professionals in Helsinki’s residential housing association industry.
Key Problems in Implementing EERs
1. Financial Constraints
The biggest hurdle for EERs in Helsinki is the substantial upfront investment required. Upgrading insulation, installing energy-efficient windows, and modernizing heating systems don’t come cheap. While long-term savings on energy bills and government subsidies help, they often don’t cover the initial outlay. The available incentives also usually don’t cover the ongoing costs beyond the initial setups, such as maintenance and operation expenses. Housing associations, already stretched thin by routine maintenance, find it hard to secure the necessary funds. Innovative financing solutions like green bonds and energy performance contracts can bridge this gap, spreading costs over time and making EERs more accessible.
2. Regulatory and Policy Barriers
Navigating Helsinki’s regulatory maze is another major challenge. Complex and inconsistent regulations can turn even the most enthusiastic renovator into a frustrated one. Housing associations must juggle numerous building codes and energy standards, which vary depending on the building’s age and type. This regulatory complexity leads to delays and increased costs. Streamlining these regulations and offering clear guidelines would simplify the process, encouraging more associations to undertake EERs.
3. Technical Challenges
Old buildings, though charming and full of character, are not easy to retrofit. Many of Helsinki’s structures were built with materials and techniques that don’t easily accommodate modern energy-efficient upgrades. Retrofitting can involve significant structural modifications, such as groundwork and foundation reinforcement for geothermal heat pumps, or replacing outdated electrical systems. These technical challenges increase the scope and cost of renovations and require specialized knowledge and innovative solutions. Developing new retrofit technologies and practices tailored to older buildings is crucial for overcoming these hurdles.
4. Lack of Awareness and Misinformation
Finally, there’s the issue of awareness and public perception. Many property owners and residents don’t know about the benefits of EERs. They might not understand the long-term savings on energy bills or the positive environmental impact. This lack of awareness can lead to skepticism and resistance, particularly when the upfront costs seem high. Informational campaigns and educational programs are essential to bridge this knowledge gap. Clear, accessible information about financial incentives, potential savings, and environmental benefits can motivate stakeholders to support and participate in EERs.
Recommended Strategies
One of the main arguments in my thesis is the need for robust financial incentives and support. Government subsidies, grants, and innovative financing solutions can make EERs more feasible for housing associations. Comprehensive financial models that consider both short-term costs and long-term savings are crucial. There is a vital need to redesign these incentive programs to offer more comprehensive support that extends throughout the lifespan of the EERs. This could involve increasing financial incentives or offering tax reductions for energy savings achieved over time. Additionally, providing more explicit information and guidance on accessing and benefiting from these incentives could improve their effectiveness and encourage more widespread adoption of energy-saving measures. Targeted financial support for low-income communities ensures that the benefits of EERs are accessible to all, promoting social equity.
My thesis also emphasizes the need for streamlined regulations and policies. Simplifying the regulatory framework and ensuring consistency across different levels of government can reduce confusion and administrative burdens. Policies designed to actively encourage energy efficiency improvements through incentives and support programs are essential.
Addressing technical challenges requires innovation. Advances in building materials and construction techniques, such as high-performance insulation and energy-efficient windows, offer new opportunities for improving energy efficiency in older buildings. Collaboration between engineers, architects, and housing associations is crucial to designing effective and feasible EER projects.
However, these efforts will fall short without enhanced awareness and education. Informational campaigns and educational programs can help property owners and residents understand the advantages of energy efficiency improvements. By engaging residents in the renovation process and demonstrating the tangible benefits of energy-efficient buildings, we can encourage a culture of sustainability and energy awareness.
Insights from the Decarbon-Home Survey
My analysis of the Decarbon-Home survey data reveals a promising trend among Helsinki residents, who are well-informed about housing carbon footprints and prefer renovations over new builds, aligning with housing professionals’ views on carbon reduction benefits. Yet, there’s a crucial need for alignment on information access and trustworthiness, as residents rely more on traditional media, which they find less trustworthy compared to expert opinions. Addressing this communication gap can significantly enhance public support for EERs and climate policy. This gap presents an opportunity for municipalities and construction experts, who are highly trusted by the public, to increase communication and share the latest information on energy efficiency, likely leading to greater community engagement and support.
In the end, EERs aren’t just about reducing carbon emissions; they’re about building a more sustainable future for Helsinki. By addressing financial constraints, regulatory barriers, technical challenges, and a lack of awareness, we can make significant strides towards carbon neutrality and a more sustainable future. It’s time for coordinated efforts from government bodies, housing associations, and residents to make this vision a reality. Investing in EERs enhances the quality of life for residents, plays a vital role in mitigating climate change, and will protect the environment for generations to come.
Writer
Gillian Henderson is a recent graduate from the University of Helsinki’s Master’s of Urban Studies and Planning. Her thesis “Exploring the Barriers to Energy-Efficiency Renovations of Housing Associations in Helsinki, Finland” is available on HELDA, the University of Helsinki Open Repository.
